Press "Enter" to skip to content

Aquinas’s theory of perception: an analytic reconstruction by Anthony J. Lisska

By Anthony J. Lisska

Anthony J. Lisska provides a brand new research of Thomas Aquinas's thought of belief. coming near near the topic from modern analytic philosophy, Lisska argues for the significance of internal experience, and indicates a modest 'innate' or 'structured' interpretation for the function of the an important college of vis cogitativa.

summary: Anthony J. Lisska provides a brand new research of Thomas Aquinas's concept of belief. drawing close the topic from modern analytic philosophy, Lisska argues for the significance of internal feel, and indicates a modest 'innate' or 'structured' interpretation for the position of the an important college of vis cogitativa

Show description

Read Online or Download Aquinas’s theory of perception: an analytic reconstruction PDF

Best epistemology books

Cognitive Systems and the Extended Mind

Cognitive platforms and the prolonged brain surveys philosophical concerns raised by means of the located stream in cognitive technology, that's, the remedy of cognitive phenomena because the joint made of mind, physique, and surroundings. The booklet focuses totally on the speculation of prolonged cognition, which asserts that human cognitive techniques actually include components past the boundary of the human organism.

Figuring Space: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics

In Figuring area Gilles Châtelet seeks to catch the matter of instinct of mobility in philosophy, arithmetic and physics. This he does through virtuality and in depth amounts (Oresme, Leibniz), wave-particle duality and point of view diagrams, philosophy of nature and Argand's and Grassman's geometric discoveries and, ultimately, Faraday's, Maxwell's and Hamilton's electrophilosophy.

Additional info for Aquinas’s theory of perception: an analytic reconstruction

Example text

Indeed, Aquinas can be read as a philosopher seeking tough-minded responses to significant philosophical queries. -A. Gauthier, who exemplifies what McInerny wishes to refute—McInerny places Aquinas not only as a leading commentator on Aristotle but also as one who adopted Aristotelian realism as a justified philosophical position. Torrell’s recent studies on Aquinas appear to adopt the Gauthier interpretive principles in opposition to McInerny, Kenny, and Pasnau, and side with Jordan’s account.

In addition, two primarily historical works, Armand Maurer’s Medieval Philosophy and David Knowles’s Evolution of Medieval Thought, copiously cite the Summa Theologiae. ’56 Likewise, most historians of philosophy outside scholasticism and neo-scholasticism give a special place to the Summa Theologiae. Most contemporary analytic philosophers who have undertaken interpretation and elucidation of Aquinas’s epistemology and philosophy of mind usually refer almost exclusively to both Summae, with special deference to the Summa Theologiae.

Names like Sorabji, Burnyeat, Putnam, and Nussbaum, and now a newer generation including Miller, Shields and Caston, are among those unearthing what insights Aristotle offers in the general area of sensation and perception conjoined with intentionality theory. ’28 Haldane reflects on this issue regarding how Aquinas’s metaphilosophy differs radically from the Cartesian starting point: [One] will not begin to see merit in [Aquinas’s position] unless one also adopts a non-Cartesian standpoint on the issue of knowledge.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.52 of 5 – based on 36 votes