By Eva Hartmann, Poul F. Kjaer (eds.)
Read or Download The Evolution of Intermediary Institutions in Europe: From Corporatism to Governance PDF
Similar economic policy & development books
Debating the worldwide monetary structure opens up the modern debate surrounding the reform of the “global monetary structure. ” Economists and political scientists discover the industrial and technical content material of other worldwide monetary regimes in addition to the political procedures during which such adjustments are negotiated.
This quantity bargains an unique standpoint at the questions the good economists have requested and appears at their importance for todays international. Written in a provocative and available sort, it examines how the varied traditions of political economic system have conceptualised financial concerns, occasions and thought.
A deeper examine the problems raised through the acclaimed 4 Horsemen movie. because the international economic system veers from hindrance to disaster, humans have eventually had adequate. Billions are denied potent entry to an economic climate that has been hijacked by means of vested pursuits. the folk who brought on the monetary drawback endure no loss, whereas the blameless majority see their dwelling criteria fall, or pay with their jobs.
Additional info for The Evolution of Intermediary Institutions in Europe: From Corporatism to Governance
It is more often analysed in terms such as public– private partnerships, stakeholding, networking, inter-organisational collaboration, regulated self-regulation, generalised political exchange, productive solidarity, productivity coalitions, learning regions, the social economy, participatory governance, associational democracy, and so on. These diverse forms can be linked via the notions of governance and meta-governance – as reﬂected in the subtitle of this volume: “from corporatism to governance”.
He had earlier suggested that corporatism, whether in pure form or as a subordinate element in hybrid regimes, could help (semi-) peripheral economies to catch up with more advanced industrial economies, and could also enhance representation and legitimation for more developed social formations (Manoïlescu, 1929). Nonetheless, these societal and statist corporatist tendencies were not all-powerful or ubiquitous. Sometimes, they were a subordinate but functional part of the economic and political order, and in the case of fascist and authoritarian regimes, corporatist projects often proved little more than an ideological cloak for other practices and institutions.
One of the many consequences of this is that the ‘ownership’ of governance frameworks is characterised by systematic uncertainty. They function as the ‘neutral ground’ where different orders engage, and this means that the ownership question tends to be a taboo. An epistemic ramiﬁcation of this is a structural condition for operationability, and, because most governance structures are characterised by an asymmetric distribution of resources and capabilities among those participating, discursive hegemony remains a permanent threat.